Smoke and Mirrors: World Bank’s $100 Million Waste Incinerator – A Deal to Leave You Baffled
The World Bank’s Disputed Investment
In 2007, the World Bank approved a $100 million loan to build a waste incinerator in the Indian village of Dadri, located in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The project, backed by the Bank’s advisory team, promised to reduce waste disposal costs and generate electricity from household waste. However, the project has been plagued by controversy, with critics labeling it a waste of money and an environmental disaster in the making.
**What’s Wrong with the Project?
- Environmental Concerns: The incinerator, built by the French company, Veolia Environmental Services, is the first of its kind in India. Critics argue that it poses significant environmental risks, including air and water pollution, and the potential release of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere and water bodies.
- Lack of Transparency: The funding process was shrouded in secrecy, with details only emerging through Freedom of Information Act requests. Transparency International, a global watchdog, labeled the project " opaque and lacking in accountability."
- High Costs: The World Bank’s own assessment of the project’s financial viability is disputed. Estimates suggest the incinerator will require significant subsidies to operate, putting a strain on local government resources.
- Alternative Options: Critics point to cheaper, cleaner, and more effective alternatives, such as sustainable waste management practices like recycling, composting, and proper solid waste disposal.
**Critics Weigh In
- "The World Bank’s decision to fund this project is a betrayal of public trust." – Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi
- "The project is a classic example of the ‘trickle-down’ effect, where only a select few benefit, while the majority are left to suffer the environmental and health impacts." – Vandana Shiva, environmental lawyer and activist
**South Asian Activists Join Forces
In response to the project’s controversy, a coalition of Indian and international organizations, including the Global Alliance for Incinerator Regulatory Reform, the Greenpeace India, and the People’s Union for Civil Liberties, have joined forces to demand a review of the project. They argue that the incinerator threatens the health, livelihoods, and human rights of millions of people in the region.
**Conclusion
The World Bank’s $100 million waste incinerator in Dadri is a prime example of the Bank’s "business-as-usual" approach to development, where profit margins are prioritized over human well-being and environmental sustainability. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, it is essential to re-examine the Bank’s policies and priorities. The people of Dadri, and those around the world, deserve better.
Read the full report [link to report] to learn more about this disputed project and the global implications of the World Bank’s approach to development.

Comments are closed